many are always smarter than a few, or are they? many are always more miserable too. many are always dumber. i mean i see that collectivism does exist, but i also believe in portfolio theory, which states that many are always less risky than a few.

i think the only point in which the two may converge is where conservatism is considered 'smart'. i believe i hate that point, hence i refuse to believe in both collectivism and portfolio theory at the same time. i hereby declare myself an individualist, i choose to stay a singular portfolio, maximizing the risk in hopes of infinite returns.

i'm sick.